Re: [nfsv4] comments on draft-welch-pnfs-ops-00.txt

Next message: Noveck, Dave: "RE: [nfsv4] comments on draft-welch-pnfs-ops-00.txt"
Previous message: Marc Eshel: "Re: [nfsv4] comments on draft-welch-pnfs-ops-00.txt"
In reply to: Nicolas Williams: "Re: [nfsv4] comments on draft-welch-pnfs-ops-00.txt"
Next in thread: Nicolas Williams: "Re: [nfsv4] comments on draft-welch-pnfs-ops-00.txt"
Reply: Nicolas Williams: "Re: [nfsv4] comments on draft-welch-pnfs-ops-00.txt"
Reply: Julian Satran: "Re: [nfsv4] comments on draft-welch-pnfs-ops-00.txt"

welch@panasas.com

Message-Id: <200411170118.iAH1IcD31663@medlicott.panasas.com>
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] comments on draft-welch-pnfs-ops-00.txt 
From: Brent Welch <welch@panasas.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 17:18:38 -0800

>>>Nicolas Williams said:

 > No, it's not.  It's clearly bounded *and* this is exactly the sort of
 > thing that was presented last week at the meeting, only there the
 > emphasis was on blocks.

I can't help but rephrase this as "we got side-tracked on blocks
and I never got a chance to describe how cool object storage is :-)

I appreciate everyone's feedback on this.  I think a concrete proposal
for both the NFSv4 storage protocol and object storage protocol
will provide a useful basis for further discussion on the pNFS 
umbrella.

--
Brent Welch
Software Architect, Panasas Inc
Delivering the premier storage system for scalable Linux clusters

www.panasas.com
welch@panasas.com

_______________________________________________
nfsv4 mailing list
nfsv4@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4