[nfsv4] Migration questions

Next message: Ted Anderson: "Re: [nfsv4] Global Namespace in NFSv4"
Previous message: Chenggong Fan: "[nfsv4] Global Namespace in NFSv4"
Next in thread: Noveck, Dave: "RE: [nfsv4] Migration questions"
Maybe reply: Noveck, Dave: "RE: [nfsv4] Migration questions"

fan@rainfinity.com

Message-ID: <416850AB.5010103@rainfinity.com>
Date: Sat, 09 Oct 2004 13:57:15 -0700
From: Chenggong Fan <fan@rainfinity.com>
Subject: [nfsv4] Migration questions

Hi,

I have some questions related to the management of file handles after 
receiving NFS4ERR_MOVED in the migration case (not the pure referral 
case). 

If a file handle is not a volatile file handle, currently the NFSv4 
client does not remember the associated pathname with each file handle, 
correct?  If that's the case, it seems difficult to make the 
NFS4ERR_MOVED and GETATTR fs_location useful in the migration case.

Let's say the client has been accessing this filesystem for a while, and 
suddenly it gets the MOVED error.  Without the associated pathname, how 
would the client be able to use fs_location information to look up the 
new file handle in the new file system?   With filehandle being an 
opaque object, the client shouldn't just replace the fsid field in the 
file handle.  It seems that for migration to work, all file handles need 
to be volatile, (or in other words, client need to keep track of 
pathnames associated with all the file handles it knows)?   Is it too 
much a load on the client?

Second, what should the client do to the other file handles that have 
the same fsid?  Should it not do anything about them?  Or should it 
expire all of them?  If the first case, the access to each fh will get a 
separate MOVED error, and the scenario is the same as the last 
paragraph.  If this is the case, file-level referral actually might be 
possible.  If the second case, again the client needed to remember the 
pathname to look up the new file handles in the new filesystem, or all 
file handles will be stale.

After all it looks that "pure referral" might be easier to support than 
migration redirection.  Am I missing anything?

Charles

_______________________________________________
nfsv4 mailing list
nfsv4@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4