RE: [nfsv4] (no subject)

Next message: Sergey Klyushin: "RE: [nfsv4] (no subject)"
Previous message: Stevan Steve Allen: "[nfsv4] (no subject)"
Maybe in reply to: Stevan Steve Allen: "[nfsv4] (no subject)"
Next in thread: Sergey Klyushin: "RE: [nfsv4] (no subject)"

Saadia.Khan@netapp.com

Subject: RE: [nfsv4] (no subject)
Message-ID: <482A3FA0050D21419C269D13989C611302D22720@lavender-fe.eng.netapp.com>
From: "Khan, Saadia" <Saadia.Khan@netapp.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 14:41:15 -0800

I believe you should return NFSERR_BADOWNER on the setattr and if this
happens on a getattr/readdir because the mapping no longer exists then
maybe the best way to handle this would be to return the internally
stored id as a string. However that may not mean anything to the client
and the client would then have to decide how to handle it.

Saadia

-----Original Message-----
From: Stevan Steve Allen [mailto:scallen@us.ibm.com] 
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 2:14 PM
To: nfsv4@ietf.org
Subject: [nfsv4] (no subject)

Question.. 

If Owner & Group name strings are not supported by the server for
SETATTR.  Can the server return it's internal string representation for
owner and group without a domain name (which is unknown) in
GETATTR/READDIR? 

Thanks,
Stevan C. Allen
NFS Development

_______________________________________________
nfsv4 mailing list
nfsv4@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4