From: Halevy, Benny (bhalevy@panasas.com)
Date: 01/23/04-10:14:59 AM Z
Message-ID: <30489F1321F5C343ACF6872B2CF7942A05D387B9@PIKES.panasas.com> From: "Halevy, Benny" <bhalevy@panasas.com> Subject: RE: [nfsv4] ACL: Is an ACE with "ACCESS MASK == 0 " legal? Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 11:14:59 -0500 As I understand it, there's nothing in the protocol saying that ACCESS_MASK == 0 is invalid. It seems useless though since it is effectively a no-op. Benny -----Original Message----- From: Wu Zheng [mailto:wzheng@us.ibm.com] Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 10:51 AM To: nfsv4@ietf.org Cc: Ravi A Shankar; Xinya Wang; Niteesh Dubey Subject: [nfsv4] ACL: Is an ACE with "ACCESS MASK == 0 " legal? Should a server accept an ACL which has one or more ACEs with "ACCESS MASK == 0 " ? Or should the server reject the ACL as an invalid argument? Wu Zheng wzheng@us.ibm.com Phone: (512) 838-0558 T/L: 678-0558 11400 Burnet Road, Austin, TX 78758 _______________________________________________ nfsv4 mailing list nfsv4@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 03/04/05-02:13:14 AM Z CST