From: Spencer Shepler (spencer.shepler@sun.com)
Date: 07/17/03-03:15:16 PM Z
From: Spencer Shepler <spencer.shepler@sun.com> Subject: Re: [nfsv4] callbacks via TCP Message-ID: <20030717201515.GF100912@dhcp-uaus08-128-207.central.sun.com> Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 15:15:16 -0500 On Thu, Jim Rees wrote: > I have been arguing for about two years now that door no. 1 is no good > because it means nfsv4 won't work well through a nat. But that's what we're > stuck with for now. > > By the way, sections 2.2 and 17.2 both still refer to udp. These references > should be removed. The only place where a netid is defined is in this RFC and section 17.2 is serving as a instantiation of an IANA registry. Even though NFSv4 will not be using UDP it was appropriate to be complete in the definitions so that if other protocols wanted to use netids then the definition would be available. -- Spencer _______________________________________________ nfsv4 mailing list nfsv4@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 03/04/05-02:12:33 AM Z CST