From: Spencer Shepler (spencer.shepler@sun.com)
Date: 07/17/03-02:44:59 PM Z
From: Spencer Shepler <spencer.shepler@sun.com> Subject: Re: [nfsv4] callbacks via TCP Message-ID: <20030717194459.GC100912@dhcp-uaus08-128-207.central.sun.com> Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 14:44:59 -0500 On Thu, rick@snowhite.cis.uoguelph.ca wrote: > This is going to sound like a dumb one, but I can't find it spelled out > in the RFC, so here goes... > > For a callback via TCP, is the server expected to > #1 - do a "connect" to the client at the specified address > OR > #2 - is it expected to find that one of the connections that already > exists from client->server has the specified address as the other end > > (Since I had done callbacks "in-band" on the > same TCP virtual circuit way back when I did NQNFS, I was thinking #2, > but I now realize the RFC probably means #1.) > > So, is it door #1 or door #2? The RFC selects Door #1. We would like to get to Door #2 in a future minor revision (or something like it). -- Spencer _______________________________________________ nfsv4 mailing list nfsv4@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 03/04/05-02:12:33 AM Z CST