From: Carl Beame (beame@eircom.net)
Date: 03/03/03-07:21:30 AM Z
From: Carl Beame <beame@eircom.net> Subject: RE: ACL in NFSv4 protocol Message-Id: <2003Mar03.132134+0000@carl> Date: 03 Mar 2003 13:21:30 +0000 On Mon Mar 03 10:28:11 2003, Gordon Waidhofer wrote: > > I believe for a POSIX ACL, the example would be: > > owner=fred fred@foo > ACL_USER_OBJ rwx OWNER@ > ACL_USER fred r-x fred@foo > > A chown would not affect the ACL. > I don't understand POSIX ACLs, but I didn't say there was an ACL for FRED@FOO, I just said there was a mode (700). Does this mean on POSIX that it automatically creates an ACL for user FRED???? On non-POSIX systems, were ACLs not separate entities and doing a "CHMOD 700 l.l" just set the mode in the inode and did nothing to the ACLs. Adding an ACL for a specific user, did it also create ACEs for the "OWNER", "GROUP", "OTHER"??? > > Now, of course, the tricky question is what are the > semantics of NFSv4 ACLs? > Good question. - Carl
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 03/04/05-02:12:12 AM Z CST