From: Brent Callaghan (brent@eng.sun.com)
Date: 12/20/02-04:14:14 PM Z
Message-ID: <3E039636.70703@eng.sun.com> Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 14:14:14 -0800 From: Brent Callaghan <brent@eng.sun.com> Subject: Re: Comments on draft-ietf-nfsv4-repl-mig-proto-00.txt I've already dropped an Email in both group's mailing lists pointing at the IETF protocol effort. Our only action should be to welcome their input and expertise in this technology. My hope is that someone might have a go at modifying Rsync or Unison to implement a strawman protocol or even have a go at describing their protocols to us. I like Dave Noveck's suggestion for a separate nfsv4-wg-mig-rep mailing list for those who are interested just in the repl-mig protocol. Brent Robert Thurlow wrote: >>And there appears to be at least two groups of enthusiastic >>implementors with running code - but no standard protocol. > > ... > >>Could there be mutual benefit here ? > > > ... > >>I've already suggested to >>both group's mailing lists that they take a look at the NFSv4 >>repl/mig work. > > > So, given that you've done that, who would take what action? > I just can't quite tell what you think would be needed. > > Rob T >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 03/04/05-01:50:45 AM Z CST