Re: Issue 77 (was "draft-02-00 posted")

New Message	Reply	About this list	Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view	Attachment view

From: mike.kupfer@sun.com
Date: 08/05/02-11:44:51 AM Z

Next message: Spencer Shepler: "aug 5th bakeoff discussion of issues"
Previous message: Mike Eisler: "Re: draft-02-00 posted"
In reply to: Benny Halevy: "Re: Issue 77 (was "draft-02-00 posted")"
Next in thread: Mike Eisler: "Re: draft-02-00 posted"

Message-Id: <200208051644.g75GiqXE902004@athyra.eng.sun.com>
From: mike.kupfer@sun.com
Subject: Re: Issue 77 (was "draft-02-00 posted") 
Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2002 09:44:51 -0700

> I would vote for "the server SHOULD grant the read".

Ah, well then it looks like Issue 77 is not in fact resolved yet.

I don't care whether it's SHOULD or MUST, but it sure seems like the
spec ought to be unambiguous on this point.

mike

Next message: Spencer Shepler: "aug 5th bakeoff discussion of issues"
Previous message: Mike Eisler: "Re: draft-02-00 posted"
In reply to: Benny Halevy: "Re: Issue 77 (was "draft-02-00 posted")"
Next in thread: Mike Eisler: "Re: draft-02-00 posted"

New Message	Reply	About this list	Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view	Attachment view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 03/04/05-01:50:08 AM Z CST