From: Sergey Klyushin (Sergey.Klyushin@hummingbird.com)
Date: 10/05/01-09:04:07 AM Z
From: "Sergey Klyushin" <Sergey.Klyushin@hummingbird.com>
Subject: RE: .x quota definition changes
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2001 10:04:07 -0400
Message-ID: <GGEOLDPPPFAMIJEOBJIBMEIEDBAA.Sergey.Klyushin@hummingbird.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Spencer Shepler [mailto:shepler@eng.sun.com]
> Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 7:15 PM
> To: nfsv4-wg@sunroof.eng.sun.com
> Subject: .x quota definition changes
>
>
> On Thu, Sergey Klyushin wrote:
> > typedefs of fattr4_quota_hard and fattr4_quota_soft were changed to
> > fattr4_quota_avail_hard
> > and fattr4_quota_avail_soft. There are also
> > const FATTR4_QUOTA_HARD = 38; and
> > const FATTR4_QUOTA_SOFT = 39;
> >
> > Should it be changed to correspond to RFC?
>
> So the RFC uses "quota_avail_*" so the two const definitions should be
> changed to something like:
>
> const FATTR4_QUOTA_AVAIL_HARD = 38;
> const FATTR4_QUOTA_AVAIL_SOFT = 39;
>
> Right?
>
> Spencer
>
I think so. RFC (page 39) says quota_avail_hard/quota_avail_soft. Just for
consistency.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 03/04/05-01:49:15 AM Z CST