RE: locking errors

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

From: Boris Z. (boris@conley.com)
Date: 10/07/98-07:46:37 PM Z 

Message-ID: <01BDF21A.6F61BDF0.boris@conley.com>
From: "Boris Z." <boris@conley.com>
Subject: RE: locking errors
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1998 17:46:37 -0700



On Wednesday, October 07, 1998 2:03 PM, Mike Eisler [SMTP:mre@Eng.Sun.COM] wrote:

> actually it could be 33 RPCs per second. David Robinson's lock proposal
> states that any rpc from a client renews all its leases.

It looks like David's proposal does not include any indicators (verifiers) 
that locks were not removed even when lease TMO expired.
Does this mean that in case of disconnect for longer then a lease TMO
a client must pessimistically abort an application?
If yes, it's a problem that has to be fixed.

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Attachment view

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 03/04/05-01:46:31 AM Z CST