From: Boris Z. (boris@conley.com)
Date: 10/07/98-06:36:55 PM Z
Message-ID: <01BDF210.B2C90940.boris@conley.com> From: "Boris Z." <boris@conley.com> Subject: RE: locking errors Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1998 16:36:55 -0700 On Wednesday, October 07, 1998 1:17 PM, Carl Beame [SMTP:beame@mail1.tinet.ie] wrote: > > I have not received any message from the NFS V4 list today, so I am > slow in responding ... Anyway I had someone send me todays messages... > > > > >If one has not implemented lease state in stable storage, then a > >default lease time of one minute seems optimal. I can't envision it > >being practical for clients to reclaim leases in less than a minute, > >and I can't envision those clients that had no leases before server > >reboot being happy with more than a minute of artificial delay. > > > > Ok, given a lease interval of 60 seconds, I would probably cause my > client to renew its leases after 30 seconds ... > > Just running a simple email program causes 8 file locks to be active > on the server. So given 1000 PC clients all doing NOTHING but have the > email program running in the background there are 8000 file locks, > each being renewed every 30 seconds or 267 renewals a second. Does > anyone see a problem with this? > > We do. A client should be able to renew all locks with a single request.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 03/04/05-01:46:31 AM Z CST