From: Boris Z. (boris@conley.com)
Date: 09/29/98-11:24:24 AM Z
Message-ID: <01BDEB8A.F353C6D0.boris@conley.com>
From: "Boris Z." <boris@conley.com>
Subject: RE: management capabilities for NFSv4
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1998 09:24:24 -0700
On Monday, September 28, 1998 3:30 PM, Carl Beame [SMTP:beame@mail1.tinet.ie] wrote:
> On Tue Sep 29 00:36:33 1998, Boris Z. wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Monday, September 28, 1998 2:27 PM, Brent Callaghan
> > [SMTP:Brent.Callaghan@Eng.Sun.COM] wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Why not SNMP and a published MIB for NFS ?
> > >
> >
> > That's exactly what we should do. We can define set of
> > well know NFS MIBs, tell which MIBs are settable and which are not,
> > and how to register optional MIBs.
> >
> > Some of well known MIBs could be a table of clients that have active
> > locks/shares ('connected'), total number of active TCP connections,
> > number of active shares, table of optional MIBs' names, etc.
> >
> > Network management folks as well as NFS vendors will be extremely
> > happy to plug in into this.
> >
> Can you have a MIB which translates a filehandle to file name?
>
We can define a well known MIB table for all active filehandle - file name pairs.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 03/04/05-01:46:25 AM Z CST