[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [MIP-QOS] MIP-QOS Requirements



Hi Hemant,
  You said Rambabu's bullets will be included in
the "interoperability with mobility protocols"
bullet.
  Then the text will be version dependent, this is the point I was trying to
make.

Hemant.Chaskar@nokia.com wrote:

> Hi,
>
> We agreed earlier that the requirements will be generic ones. A solution for
> v4 can be different from v6 or could be the same for both. The solution
> designer will address the issues pertinent to particular version of
> protocol.
>
> Hemant
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext Behcet Sarikaya [mailto:behcet.sarikaya@usa.alcatel.com]
> Sent: 19. April 2001 10:48
> To: mip-qos@research.nokia.com
> Cc: 'Hemant.Chaskar@nokia.com'
> Subject: Re: [MIP-QOS] MIP-QOS Requirements
>
> Hi Hemant,
>   My concern in Rambabu's bullets is that it assumes mipv4 only. In mipv6
> there is no FA. So should we make another bullet for mipv6 with proper
> wording?
>
> ext Rambabu Tummala wrote:
>
>
>
> Hemant,
>
> I see these are two possible areas that QOS needs to be addressed with
> respect to Reverse tunneling.
> 1.  With reverse tunneling an end-to-end QOS Path setup is not applicable to
> the Mobile since its identity in the IP packet is lost (because of ip-in-ip
> encapsulation) in the foreign network.  So QOS setup needs to be aware of
> the fact that the Mobile Node is using reverse tunneling.
>
> 2. Another scenario is Mobile Node is handing off from an FA(which is not
> supporting reverse tunneling and an end-to-end QOS path is setup for MN's
> packet stream) to an FA which supports the reverse tunneling.  The QOS
> mechanism should be aware and support this scenario and vice-versa.
>
>
>
> Rambabu Tummala
> Nortel Networks
> ESN 444-8970
> External (972)684-8970
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hemant.Chaskar@nokia.com [ mailto:Hemant.Chaskar@nokia.com
> <mailto:Hemant.Chaskar@nokia.com> ]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 4:41 PM
> To: mip-qos@research.nokia.com
> Subject: RE: [MIP-QOS] MIP-QOS Requirements
>
> Could you elaborate little more on what exactly is the issue with reverse
> tunneling as regards QoS.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext Rambabu Tummala [ mailto:tummala@nortelnetworks.com
> <mailto:tummala@nortelnetworks.com> ]
> Sent: 18. April 2001 17:36
> To: mip-qos@research.nokia.com
> Subject: [MIP-QOS] MIP-QOS Requirements
>
>
> I would like add this as a requirement.
> * The scope of any solution should take RFC 3024 - Reverse Tunneling for
> Mobile IP into consideration.
>
> Regards,
>
> Rambabu Tummala

--
Behcet