RE: The long-expired LASER draft

From: Randall S. Winchester (rsw@sendmail.com)
Date: Fri Mar 15 2002 - 14:50:25 PST


To include, or not to include the "mail" attribute..... is my opinion
of part of the reason it died on the vine.

We also need to make sure we publish all the OID's, as well as
validate their uniqueness (i.e. do not assign maillocaladdress the
mailalternateaddress OID, and the same for inetlocalmailrecipient and
mailrecipient).

Randall

On Fri, 15 Mar 2002, Vaudreuil, Greg M (Greg) wrote:

: I would appreciate seeing this draft published in a reference able form.
: Why did the work item die?
:
: GReg V.
:
: -----Original Message-----
: From: Gregory Neil Shapiro [mailto:gshapiro+laser@gshapiro.net]
: Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 2:03 PM
: To: laser@sunroof.eng.sun.com
: Subject: The long-expired LASER draft
:
:
: The LASER draft expired a long time ago. However, some products have used
: some or all of the information from that draft. I am considering
: publishing it as an informational or experimental RFC just so those who are
: using it have a reference.
:
: Would this upset anyone greatly?
:



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Thu Oct 24 2002 - 10:31:46 PDT